1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Excess excise duty refund directed to Consumer Welfare Fund, not unjust enrichment.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held that the excess excise duty paid did not result in unjust enrichment as it was not passed on to the consumer. ... Refund - Unjust enrichment The judgment by Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dealt with the issue of refund of excise duty paid in excess, leading to unjust enrichment. The tribunal found that the duty incidence had not been passed on to the consumer, so the refund was to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was modified accordingly.