Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the truck mounted crane imported by the appellant was classifiable under Heading 84.26 so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 61/99, or whether it fell under sub-heading 8426.41 and was therefore outside the exemption.
Analysis: The exemption covered goods classifiable under Heading 84.26 other than those falling under sub-heading 8426.41. The residuary sub-heading 8426.99 could not apply because the goods were self-propelled machinery mounted on a truck. Sub-heading 8426.12 was also inapplicable because the goods were neither a mobile lifting frame on tyres nor a straddle carrier. The material on record, including the literature describing the crane, did not support classification under the appellant's suggested sub-headings, and the cited decisions did not assist because they dealt with different classification controversies.
Conclusion: The imported truck mounted crane was not entitled to classification under the claimed sub-headings and the denial of exemption was upheld.