Speaking order requirement: unexplained tribunal dismissal was unsustainable and warranted remand for fresh adjudication.

A judicial or quasi-judicial authority must record reasons for its conclusion because reasons demonstrate application of mind and satisfy the requirement of a speaking order. An order that merely notes rival submissions and dismisses an appeal without any reasoning is deficient and offends natural justice. On that basis, the Tribunal's unexplained dismissal could not be sustained, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication; consideration of the merits of the reassessment and related additions was therefore unnecessary.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order, having been passed without reasons, could be sustained and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: A judicial or quasi-judicial authority is required to record reasons in support of its conclusion, as reasons show application of mind to the issues raised by the aggrieved party. The Tribunal's order merely noted the rival grounds and submissions and then dismissed the assessee's appeal without assigning any reason. Such a laconic order violated the requirement of a speaking order and offended a facet of natural justice. In those circumstances, it was unnecessary to decide the merits of the reassessment and related additions.

Conclusion: The Tribunal's order could not be sustained and the matter was rightly remanded to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication.

---