Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit taken on raw materials used in the manufacture of the final product was includible in the assessable value of the final product, and whether the revenue appeal required to be kept pending merely because the larger bench decision was under challenge before the Supreme Court.
Analysis: The issue was treated as already covered by Tribunal decisions, including the Larger Bench ruling in Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd., which held that Modvat credit on raw materials used in manufacture is not includible in the assessable value of the final product. The same view had been applied in other tribunal decisions. The fact that the Larger Bench decision had been appealed before the Supreme Court did not justify keeping the matter pending in the absence of any stay of operation of that decision.
Conclusion: The assessable value could not include the Modvat credit taken on raw materials used in manufacture, and the plea to keep the matter pending was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The revenue challenge failed, and the order in favour of the assessee was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a stay, a binding tribunal precedent covering the issue must be followed, and Modvat credit on raw materials used in manufacture is not includible in the assessable value of the final product.