Dutiable intermediate goods in glass bead manufacture upheld, while the penalty was reduced for excessiveness.

Glass tubes arising in the manufacture of glass beads were treated as dutiable intermediate goods because the bead-making process was a downstream activity and the appellants had no facility to produce basic glass. The duty demand on the glass tubes was upheld. The penalty was also found excessive on the facts, and it was reduced substantially.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether glass tubes arising in the course of manufacture of glass beads were dutiable intermediate goods; (ii) Whether the penalty required interference.

Issue (i): Whether glass tubes arising in the course of manufacture of glass beads were dutiable intermediate goods.

Analysis: The manufacture of glass beads was found to be a downstream process, and the appellants had no facility for producing basic glass. The glass tubes formed the starting material and an intermediate product in the process. The lower authorities' view that such glass tubes were liable to duty was accepted.

Conclusion: The duty demand on the glass tubes was upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalty required interference.

Analysis: In the facts and circumstances, the penalty was considered excessive and was reduced.

Conclusion: The penalty was reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 5,000.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the duty demand but succeeded to the limited extent of reduction of penalty, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.

---