Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PCC poles manufactured by the assessee were liable to be valued by including a notional margin of profit under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975.
Analysis: The valuation of goods was required to be made under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975 read with Rule 6(b)(ii), which contemplates assessment on the basis of cost of production together with profits, if any, which the assessee would normally earn on sale of such goods. The fact that the electricity board consumed the poles for its own use did not exclude the element of profit for valuation purposes, because PCC poles were marketable and, if sold, would normally carry some margin of profit. The adjudicating authority had adopted a 10% margin of profit, and no material was shown to render that estimate unreasonable.
Conclusion: The inclusion of a 10% margin of profit in the assessable value was upheld and the contention of the assessee was rejected.