Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 11/97-Cus. was available to the imported software and, for deciding that question, whether the software could be treated as computer software on the available technical material.
Analysis: The exemption under the notification was confined to computer software. The earlier view that software used for operating a machine performing a specific function could also fall within the exemption was noted, but the record contained no technical literature or data to show whether the imported software was used in a system containing an automatic data processing machine. Mere use for telecommunication purposes was not enough to classify it as computer software. In the absence of technical evidence on the working of the machine in which the software was to be used, the issue could not be conclusively decided.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after considering the technical data and the working of the machines. The appeal succeeded by way of remand.
Final Conclusion: The exemption claim was not finally decided on merits and required reconsideration on the basis of technical evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility to exemption for software depends on its established character as computer software on the basis of technical evidence, and a mere telecommunication use description is insufficient.