TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal success: Metal ladle assembly reclassified after evidence presented</h1> <h3>MUKAND LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-VI</h3> The appeal concerned the classification of goods by the appellant, described as a specific metal charging ladle assembly. The appellant sought ... Ladle assembly - Classification of The appeal was about the classification of goods manufactured by the appellant. The goods were described as '150t Hot Metal Charging Ladle Assembly with Bale Arm and Protection Plate.' The appellant claimed classification under sub-heading 10 of Heading 8454.00, while the Commissioner classified them under sub-heading 90. The Commissioner's conclusion was based on the appellant removing the machine in disassembled form for transportation. The appellant agreed to provide evidence to support their claim within two months, leading to the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside for further consideration by the Commissioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
