Machine parts classification turns on technical evidence identifying disassembled goods as constituent components of a complete machine.

Classification of goods cleared in disassembled condition depended on whether blueprints, diagrams, technical specifications or similar material established that they were identifiable as constituent parts of a complete machine under Heading 8454.00. In the absence of sufficient technical evidence showing that the instalment-wise clearances could be treated as complete machinery parts rather than mere parts, the lower authority's classification was considered reasonable. The appellant was nevertheless allowed to produce further material before the Commissioner, and the impugned order was set aside with the matter remitted for reconsideration on a fuller evidentiary record.

---

---

Issues: Whether the goods manufactured by the appellant were classifiable under Heading 8454.00, sub-heading 10 as complete machinery parts, or under sub-heading 90 as parts, and whether the classification could be upheld without adequate technical evidence.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the goods cleared in disassembled condition could still be identified, on the basis of blueprints, diagrams, technical specifications or comparable material, as constituent parts of a complete machine. In the absence of sufficient evidence establishing that the goods cleared in instalments were identifiable as parts of a complete machine, the classification adopted by the lower authority appeared reasonable. The appellant was, however, given an opportunity to place satisfactory material before the Commissioner.

Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside, with the matter remitted for reconsideration after the parties produced further material.

---