Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing the value of first clearances under Paragraph 1 of Notification No. 1/93, the clearances were to be reckoned from the date on which the manufacturer elected to avail the notification or from the commencement of the financial year.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined its earlier decisions and found that the ratio applied in the earlier cases supported reckoning the first clearances from the date the manufacturer chose to avail the notification. It held that the department's contention based on the commencement of the financial year had not been the issue decided in the cited precedents and did not justify interference with the earlier view.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed, and the Tribunal affirmed the computation of first clearances from the date of election to avail the notification.
Ratio Decidendi: For an exemption notification framed on the basis of first clearances, the relevant starting point is the date on which the manufacturer elects to avail the notification, where the governing precedent so holds.