TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a rectification application could be entertained on the basis of new pleas not raised at the time of hearing and whether any mistake apparent from the record existed.
Analysis: The application sought to introduce a new case by raising contentions that had not been pleaded or argued when the final order was passed. A matter that requires fresh examination of facts or law, or that is brought out only by elaborate argument, does not amount to a mistake apparent from the record. Rectification is limited to obvious errors and cannot be used as a substitute for appeal or review.
Conclusion: The application was not maintainable on the alleged ground of rectification and was rejected.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
