Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods purchased before the enhancement of purchase tax, but found later to be last purchases in the State because of subsequent events, were taxable at the increased rate or at the rate prevailing on the date of purchase.
Analysis: Liability to purchase tax arose when later events established that the purchases had the character of last purchases within the State. However, the incidence and rate of tax had to be determined with reference to the date on which the purchases were made, since the taxable event was the purchase itself and not the later ascertainment of its character. The Court agreed with the view that subsequent determination of taxability did not attract the enhanced rate introduced after the purchases were effected.
Conclusion: The purchases were taxable at the rate of 3% prevailing when they were made, not at the increased rate of 5% introduced later.