Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether powdering of scrap tyres to make crump rubber amounts to manufacture attracting central excise duty.
Analysis: The activity was considered in the light of the earlier tribunal view that crushing rubber into powder does not amount to manufacture. That view had also been upheld when the department's challenge was dismissed by the Supreme Court on the ground that the crushed product was not a new product, commercially or chemically, and the finding was essentially one of fact. The appellants' process was stated to be the same as that of their competitor in the earlier case.
Conclusion: The activity does not amount to manufacture and is not liable to central excise duty. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.