Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel fabricated storage facilities erected at site for storing petroleum products amounted to excisable goods liable to duty under Chapter 83 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether penalty could be imposed when no levy was sustainable.
Analysis: The fabricated storage tanks came into existence only by piece-by-piece assembly at the premises, and their size and manner of construction showed that they resulted in immovable property. The Board's circular and the prior Tribunal decision on similar site-fabricated storage facilities were followed. Since the goods were not exigible to central excise levy, classification under Chapter 83 could not sustain a duty demand. Once no duty was leviable, penalty also could not survive.
Conclusion: The storage facilities were held to be not liable to central excise duty, the duty demand and penalty were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.