Refund of excise duty on returned, reprocessed goods upheld after re-clearance on duty payment.

Refund of excise duty was claimed on goods first cleared on duty payment, later returned by buyers, reprocessed in the factory, and cleared again on duty payment. The lower authority rejected the claim for lack of sufficient proof that duty had been paid twice on the same goods. The appellate authority accepted that the returned consignments had been brought back under D-3 declaration, reprocessed, and re-cleared on payment of duty, and therefore treated the assessee as eligible for refund. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with that analysis, and the refund claim was left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to refund of duty on goods cleared initially on payment of duty, returned by buyers, reprocessed in the factory, and cleared again on payment of duty.

Analysis: The refund claim was rejected by the lower authority on the ground that there was no sufficient evidence to establish that duty had been paid twice on the same goods. The appellate authority found that the returned consignments had been brought back into the factory under D-3 declaration, reprocessed, and cleared again on payment of duty, and therefore held the assessee to be eligible for refund. The Tribunal found that this issue had already been properly analysed by the appellate authority and saw no reason to interfere.

Conclusion: The refund claim was not disturbed, and the appeal was dismissed.

---