Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court ought to have decided the merits of the taxability of the supply transactions after recording that the writ petition had become infructuous.
Analysis: Once the State Government assured the High Court that the impugned instructions would be withdrawn, no further issue survived for adjudication in the writ petition. The High Court was not justified in going on to pronounce upon whether the transactions amounted to sales liable to tax under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. Findings recorded on a question that no longer required decision could not be allowed to stand, and the proper course was for the Assessing Authorities to consider the matter independently and in accordance with law, without being influenced by the withdrawn instructions or by any opinion previously expressed.
Conclusion: The High Court's observations and findings on the merits were vacated and the writ petition was treated as infructuous.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the High Court's merits determination was set aside, leaving the taxability issue open for consideration by the Assessing Authorities in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A court should not decide the merits of a dispute once the matter has become infructuous, and any findings recorded on such a non-surviving issue may be vacated.