Restoration of appeal refused where dismissal was on merits, no sufficient cause was shown, and Modvat credit was unavailable under DEPB.

Restoration of an appeal dismissed on merits was refused because the applicants failed to show sufficient cause for their non-appearance, and no prejudice was demonstrated from the ex parte absence. The Tribunal also held that Modvat credit was not available on duty-free inputs imported under the DEPB scheme, and it found the penalty upheld in the original order not to be excessive. The earlier dismissal therefore remained undisturbed, and there was no basis to recall the order or restore the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application for restoration of the appeal dismissed on merits was liable to be allowed.

Analysis: The appeal had been decided on merits and dismissed after examining the record, and the non-appearance of the appellants was not found to be for sufficient cause. The Tribunal also held that the appellants had no entitlement to Modvat credit on duty-free inputs imported under the DEPB scheme, and the penalty upheld was not excessive.

Conclusion: The application for restoration was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The earlier dismissal of the appeal on merits remained undisturbed, and no basis was found to recall the order or restore the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: A restoration application will not be allowed where the appeal was dismissed on merits, the applicant shows no sufficient cause for non-appearance, and no prejudice is shown from the ex parte absence.

---