TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to a cash refund of duty paid through PLA for the relevant period when Modvat credit under Rule 57H was granted later and the final product had meanwhile become exempt.
Analysis: The refund claim related to duty paid through PLA on inputs used captively. The Tribunal found that there was no legal provision for grant of such cash refund in the circumstances of the case. Rule 57F permitted cash refund only in specified export situations where credit could not be adjusted, and the present case did not involve export under bond or the kind of situation covered by that rule. The Tribunal also accepted the finding that the assessee had in fact continued to utilise the available credit for subsequent clearances, so the plea of complete inability to use the credit was not established. The cited authority on transfer of unutilised proforma credit and limitation was held to be inapplicable.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to cash refund of the duty paid through PLA, and the rejection of the refund claim was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Cash refund of Modvat credit is not allowable unless the case falls within the specific statutory situations permitting such refund, and a claim based merely on delayed availability or later non-use of credit is not maintainable.
TaxTMI 
