Brand-name exclusion under Small Scale Exemption prevents any valid opt-out from the notification's concessional scheme.

Goods bearing another person's brand name were excluded from Small Scale Exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., so the manufacturer was outside the notification itself. In that situation, filing a classification declaration showing tariff-rate duty did not amount to a valid option to forego the exemption, because the opting-out clause applied only where the manufacturer was otherwise entitled to choose the concessional benefit. The brand-name exclusion therefore governed, and no statutory opt-out arose from an exemption that was already unavailable by operation of the notification.

---

---

Issues: Whether the benefit of Small Scale Exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was available to goods affixed with the brand name of another person, and whether filing a classification declaration showing tariff rate amounted to a valid option to forego the exemption.

Analysis: Paragraph 1 of the notification provided the exemption and concessional slab rates, while the relevant opting-out clause applied only where the manufacturer was otherwise entitled to choose whether to avail the exemption under that paragraph. Paragraph 4 expressly excluded specified goods bearing the brand name or trade name of another person, registered or unregistered. Since the goods manufactured were admitted to be branded goods for customers and no material was produced to rebut that position, the manufacturer was outside the benefit of the notification itself. In that situation, there was no available statutory option to opt out of an exemption that was already unavailable by operation of the brand-name exclusion.

Conclusion: The manufacturer was not eligible for the exemption, but the alleged exercise of option to pay duty at tariff rate was ineffective because the brand-name exclusion under the notification applied. The demand and penalty were not sustained and relief was granted to the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside on the ground that branded goods were excluded from the exemption and no valid opt-out under the notification arose.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are excluded from a notification by reason of a brand-name bar, the manufacturer cannot be treated as having exercised an option to forgo that exemption under the notification's opting clause.

---