Customs classification disputes require the appellate authority to decide tariff classification itself before dropping a duty demand.

In a customs classification dispute, imported goods were claimed under one tariff sub-heading while the department treated them as falling under another. The appellate authority could not drop the duty demand merely because the adjudicating authority had not properly decided classification; it was required to determine the classification issue itself and issue a speaking order. As the classification question remained unresolved, the order setting aside the demand was not sustainable and was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate authority could set aside the duty demand without itself deciding the classification dispute relating to the imported goods.

Analysis: The imported goods were claimed to fall under one tariff sub-heading, while the customs authorities treated them as classifiable under another. The adjudicating authority and the appellate authority had not conclusively decided the classification issue. The appellate authority was not justified in dropping the demand merely because the adjudicating authority had not recorded a proper decision on classification. It had the power and duty to decide the classification issue itself and pass a speaking order.

Conclusion: The order dropping the demand could not be sustained and was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.

---