Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed reduction of share capital under the Companies Act, 1956 should be confirmed and the minutes approved.
Analysis: The company had passed a special resolution for reduction of its paid-up share capital and sought confirmation of the Court under the statutory scheme governing reduction of capital. The Court noted that the reduction was intended to write off accumulated losses and to present a true and fair capital structure. It also noted that the articles authorised reduction, that the creditors had been notified, that a large number of creditors had given no-objection letters, and that there was nothing on record to show that the proposal was unjust or unfair. The company further offered to furnish a bank guarantee to secure the claims of creditors who had not consented.
Conclusion: The reduction of share capital was confirmed and the proposed minutes were approved.