TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, in exercise of revisional power under section 20(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, the Additional Commissioner could reassess gross turnover by taking into account additional material not before the assessing officer; (ii) Whether the Additional Commissioner could rely upon the report of the Commercial Tax Officer and the enquiry made under section 14(1) and rule 80A, even though the enquiry had commenced before the revision petition was filed.
Issue (i): Whether, in exercise of revisional power under section 20(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, the Additional Commissioner could reassess gross turnover by taking into account additional material not before the assessing officer.
Analysis: The revisional power was held to be widely worded and not confined by any express limitation to the record of the assessing officer. The power to revise could extend to re-examination of the assessment, correction of error, and enhancement of turnover where escaped items were discovered. The absence of separate provisions for escaped turnover did not restrict the revisional authority from considering fresh material in appropriate cases.
Conclusion: The Additional Commissioner was competent to reassess gross turnover by considering additional material, and the answer was in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the Additional Commissioner could rely upon the report of the Commercial Tax Officer and the enquiry made under section 14(1) and rule 80A, even though the enquiry had commenced before the revision petition was filed.
Analysis: The Act and the Rules empowered the revisional authority to make or cause to be made such enquiry as it thought fit. Section 14 also authorised calling for accounts, documents, and information necessary for the purposes of the Act. Since the appellant was given notice and a reasonable opportunity to explain the discrepancies and meet the report, reliance on the material collected in the enquiry did not transgress jurisdiction or violate the statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The Additional Commissioner could lawfully rely on the report and the enquiry material, and the answer was in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The revisional authority's power under the sales tax law was held broad enough to consider fresh material and to enhance assessment after due notice and hearing, so the appeals were rejected on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute confers wide revisional power without confining it to the existing record, the revisional authority may consider additional material, direct further enquiry, and enhance the assessment, provided the affected party is given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
TaxTMI 
