Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a unit registered with the Directorate General of Technical Development, and granted SSI registration only later, could claim exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. for the earlier period on the basis that the SSI certificate was stated to be valid from the date of commencement of production.
Analysis: The exemption under the notification was available only to a factory registered with the Director of Industries or the Development Commissioner as a small-scale industry under the Industries (Development and Regulations) Act, 1951, subject to the stated exceptions. The unit was admittedly registered with DGTD during the relevant period and had applied for SSI registration only in 1990, with the certificate issued on 7-12-90. The later departmental clarification that the certificate related back to an earlier date did not satisfy the notification's requirement for the material period. The unit also did not bring itself within either proviso to paragraph 4 of the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to SSI exemption for the relevant period, and the demand of duty was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the excise demand and penalty were left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility for SSI exemption under the notification depends on satisfaction of the prescribed registration condition during the relevant period, and a later or retrospective clarification of registration cannot by itself confer the exemption for an earlier period.