TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision Canceling Penalty for Non-Resident Company</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Mitsui And Co. Ltd. And Another.</h3> Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Mitsui And Co. Ltd. And Another. - [2005] 272 ITR 545, 190 CTR 38, 140 TAXMANN 430 Issues:1. Agitation by Revenue against Tribunal's order.2. Question of cancelling penalty under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Requirement of separate appeals for different financial years.4. Non-resident company's case involving payment to Japanese technicians.5. Dispute over tax deduction at source and penalty imposition.6. Tribunal's decision on reasonable cause for non-deduction of TDS.7. Tribunal's detailed examination of pros and cons.8. Tribunal's consideration of retention payment to expatriate employees.9. Tribunal's reliance on Gujarat High Court decision in CIT v. S.G. Pgnatale [1980] 124 ITR 391.Analysis:1. The High Court dealt with an appeal by the Revenue challenging the Tribunal's decision, arguing it was perverse.2. The primary issue was whether the Tribunal was correct in canceling the penalty imposed under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. The High Court noted the necessity of separate appeals for different financial years and directed the Revenue to pay court fees accordingly.4. The case involved a non-resident company that set up a project office in India and paid Japanese technicians in Indian currency for work done in India.5. Disagreement arose over tax deduction at source, leading to penalty imposition, which the Tribunal later found unnecessary due to reasonable cause.6. The Tribunal concluded that there was a reasonable cause for the non-deduction of TDS, considering various factors and legal provisions.7. The Tribunal extensively reviewed the case in a 90-page judgment, analyzing all material presented.8. Detailed examination of retention payment to expatriate employees was conducted, supported by a decision from the Gujarat High Court.9. The Tribunal's thorough analysis and conclusion were upheld by the High Court, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 