Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a company can be ordered to be wound up under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 if, after filing of the winding-up petition, the respondent pays the principal debt during the pendency of the petition but refuses to pay the interest.
Analysis: The Court considered circumstances where the liability to pay the principal debt was not disputed and was in fact discharged by the company sought to be wound up to avoid winding-up. The Court relied on the principle that the company judge is the appropriate forum to determine entitlement to interest on the amount in question so as to avoid multiplicity of litigation. The invoices contained an express stipulation for interest (19.5% per annum) which was not objected to by the purchaser, and trade usage supports liability to pay interest for delayed payment. Taking into account prevailing banking rates and comparable decisions of the Division Bench in Company Appeal No. 16 of 1984, the Court held that an award of interest at a reasonable rate is appropriate where interest is disputed but principal is paid during pendency of a winding-up petition. The Court fixed interest at 12% per annum until payment and directed that if interest is not paid within one month the petition shall be advertised.
Conclusion: The petitioner is entitled to interest at the rate of 12% per annum until payment; if the respondent fails to pay the interest within one month the winding-up petition shall be advertised and the petition proceeds accordingly.