Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 5/94-C.E. on cement clearances made after availing Notification No. 1/93-C.E. up to the eligible limit.
Analysis: Notification No. 1/93-C.E. granted exemption or concessional duty to small scale units, while Notification No. 5/94-C.E. granted a concessional rate for cement subject to its own conditions. The second proviso to Notification No. 5/94-C.E. barred its application only where the same cement, at the point of clearance, was covered by the exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The bar was held to prevent simultaneous availment on the same consignment and not to deny the concessional rate for clearances beyond the exemption limit already exhausted under Notification No. 1/93-C.E.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to avail Notification No. 5/94-C.E. for clearances beyond Rs. 50 lakhs, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal affirmed that the debarring clause did not prohibit sequential use of the two notifications on different clearances and sustained the concessional duty benefit under Notification No. 5/94-C.E. after exhaustion of the small scale exemption limit.
Ratio Decidendi: A notification barring its application where another exemption is availed prevents only simultaneous benefit on the same clearance and does not preclude concessional duty on subsequent clearances after the earlier exemption limit is exhausted.