Concessional import duty cannot be recovered on manufacturing scrap when imported goods are used for their intended purpose.

Imported electrical steel sheets cleared under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. were held to have satisfied the intended manufacturing use, so Rule 8 of the 1996 concessional import rules did not apply. Customs duty could not be recovered merely because waste and scrap arose during manufacture of transformers, absent any express recovery condition in the notification or statute. On the interim issue, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived because the goods were not shown to have been diverted or cleared as waste and scrap.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether pre-deposit of the duty demand and penalty was required to be waived pending hearing of the appeals. (ii) Whether customs duty could be recovered on waste and scrap generated during manufacture when the imported electrical steel sheets had been used for the intended purpose under Notification No. 20/99-Cus.

Issue (i): Whether pre-deposit of the duty demand and penalty was required to be waived pending hearing of the appeals.

Analysis: The imported electrical steel sheets were covered by Notification No. 20/99-Cus., and there was no allegation that the goods had been cleared under the guise of waste and scrap or that they were diverted from the intended manufacturing use. In these circumstances, the balance of convenience favoured the applicants.

Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived.

Issue (ii): Whether customs duty could be recovered on waste and scrap generated during manufacture when the imported electrical steel sheets had been used for the intended purpose under Notification No. 20/99-Cus.

Analysis: The notification granted concessional duty for electrical steel sheets required for the manufacture of electrical transformers. The imported goods were admittedly used in the manufacture of transformers, and Rule 8 of the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 1996 was inapplicable because it is attracted only where the imported goods are not used for the intended purpose. No condition in the notification authorised recovery of duty merely because waste and scrap arose during manufacture.

Conclusion: Customs duty was not recoverable on the waste and scrap, and the demand was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals succeeded on merits.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are used for the intended manufacturing purpose under a concessional import notification, duty cannot be recovered merely because waste and scrap arise during the manufacturing process in the absence of an express statutory or notification-based recovery condition.

---