Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained against a registered dealer under Rule 173Q(1)(bbb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in the absence of any allegation or finding of wilful entry of wrong or incorrect particulars in the invoice with intent to facilitate inadmissible credit.
Analysis: Penalty under Rule 173Q(1)(bbb) is attracted only where a registered dealer wilfully enters wrong or incorrect particulars in the invoice with the intent to enable the buyer to avail credit not otherwise permissible. The appellate record did not contain any allegation or finding of such wilful or intentional conduct. The amount ordered to be recovered from the dealer had already been set aside and was not under challenge by the Revenue. In these circumstances, the statutory precondition for penal action was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and was rightly set aside in favour of the assessee.