Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent company was liable to be wound up on the ground of inability to pay its debts and loss of substratum.
Analysis: The petitioning creditor established a debt exceeding the statutory minimum, and the respondent company did not effectively dispute the liability. The company's own case showed that its factory, premises, and machinery had been taken over by the Karnataka State Financial Corporation, leaving it without the means to carry on business. The existence of other recovery suits and the admitted financial condition reinforced the conclusion that the company was commercially defunct. The Court also noted that the validity of the Financial Corporation's action under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, need not be adjudicated in these proceedings, as the immediate question was the company's present inability to function and meet its obligations.
Conclusion: The respondent company was unable to pay its debts and had lost its substratum, so the winding-up petition was maintainable and the company was ordered to be wound up.