Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the small-scale exemption under Notification No. 16/97-C.E. when the concrete cement slabs bore the mark "ESSAR".
Analysis: The goods were not shown to be sold in the market as branded goods, nor was there any basis to treat the mark as one used to indicate a connection in the course of trade. The mark was found to be only an identification mark and not a brand name or trade name used for trading the goods. In these circumstances, the mischief of paragraph 4 of the notification was not attracted, and the exemption could not be denied on the ground of brand-name use.
Conclusion: The respondents were entitled to the small-scale exemption, and the Revenue's appeal failed.