Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported medical film processor was classifiable under Heading 90.22 or Heading 90.10.
Analysis: The impugned goods were used only for developing X-ray films and did not generate X-rays or contain X-ray generating tubes. The earlier classification dispute had already been decided against the assessee on the ground that Heading 90.22 applies only to apparatus based on the use of X-rays or alpha, beta or gamma radiations. It was further held that, even if the goods were exclusively meant for X-ray film development, they were most akin to photographic film developers under Heading 90.10 and could be classified accordingly under Rule 4 of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Tariff Schedule.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 90.10 was upheld and the assessee's alternative claim under Heading 90.22 was rejected.