1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Upholding Tax Validity Decision</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Allahabad High Court decision in a tax validity challenge under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The dismissal ... Whether article 226 can be used for challenging the validity of the orders passed prior to January 26, 1950? Held that:- Appeal dismissed. As agreeing with the High Court that the petitioner had an adequate alternative remedy by way of going up in appeal against the impugned orders. He having failed to do so, cannot be permitted to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under article 226 of the Constitution. In this connection, we may also note that if the petitioner had instituted a suit for refund of the tax, the same would have been barred by limitation. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the decision of the Allahabad High Court in a writ petition challenging the validity of tax imposed under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The petitioner's delay in filing the petition and failure to pursue alternative remedies were key reasons for the dismissal. The court noted that ignorance of the law is not an excuse for delay. The appeal was dismissed, but no costs were awarded due to the unlawful tax collection.