Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activity of programming EPROMs used in STD/PCO equipment rendered the goods classifiable under Heading 8517.00 of the tariff, and whether the resultant duty demand could be sustained.
Analysis: The equipment in question was used to measure call duration, calculate charges, and display call details, but it did not itself perform line telephony or telegraphy. The Explanatory Notes relied upon for Heading 85.17 covered telephone sets and integrated telephone devices, but did not support treating a device that merely assists in the functioning of a telephone booth system as an apparatus for line telephony. The programmed EPROMs were found to be, at most, an adjunct to the telephone system and not a part or accessory of it. The claimed alternative classification under Heading 85.24 was not examined on merits.
Conclusion: Classification under Heading 8517.00 was not sustainable and the duty demand based on that classification failed; the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A device that only assists in measuring, recording, or displaying telephone call data, without itself constituting apparatus for line telephony, is not classifiable as electronic apparatus for line telephony under Heading 8517.