Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be levied under section 12 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 merely because an incorrect return had been filed, when the assessment of the relevant turnover was not made on a best judgment basis.
Analysis: Section 12(2) authorises best judgment assessment where no return is filed or where the return is incomplete or incorrect. Section 12(3) permits penalty only when the assessment is made under section 12(2). The two sub-sections must be read together. Penalty is therefore attracted only where the assessing authority actually resorts to best judgment assessment. On the facts, the disputed turnovers were taken from the assessee's own books of account and were not determined by estimate or guesswork. Since the assessment of those items was not a best judgment assessment, the statutory condition for penalty was absent.
Conclusion: Penalty could not be levied in respect of the items assessed from the assessee's account books, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.