Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional power under section 15(1) of the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act, 1125 could be exercised after three years under rule 33 where the assessment dispute concerned the legality, propriety and regularity of exemption granted on auction sales.
Analysis: Section 15(1) empowered the revisional authority to interfere with an assessment order where illegality, impropriety or irregularity had occurred in the assessing authority's decision. The controversy was not one of escaped turnover, but of the correctness of the exemption granted under the commission licence. In such a case, the limitation applicable was that contained in section 15 itself, namely four years from the date of communication of the assessment order, and not the three-year period under rule 33, which applies to escaped turnover matters.
Conclusion: The revisional power was validly exercised under section 15(1), and the three-year limitation under rule 33 did not apply.
Ratio Decidendi: Where revision is directed against the legality, propriety or regularity of an assessment order, the specific limitation in the revisional provision governs, and the escaped-turnover limitation cannot be invoked.