Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on carbon tetrachloride used for cleaning machinery components, and on steel strips and seal kits used for packing and sealing finished goods, where the declaration had been filed under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: Carbon tetrachloride used for cleaning machinery components was treated as an eligible input, following the view that cleaning material used for such purposes qualifies for credit. Steel strips and seal kits, though not capital goods under Rule 57Q, were in substance packing materials better covered as inputs under Rule 57A. A declaration filed under Rule 57Q was held sufficient to support credit under Rule 57A as well, in line with the earlier Tribunal view relied upon in the order.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all the disputed items, and the denial of credit was not sustainable.