Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether measuring and checking instruments used in the factory qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q for availment of credit.
Analysis: The instruments did not themselves produce or process goods, but they were used to ensure that goods at different stages of manufacture conformed to required dimensions and specifications. The reasoning that such instruments could never be used for bringing about change in a substance was held to be too simplistic. The Tribunal relied on the broader understanding of capital goods under Rule 57Q, under which machinery, apparatus and similar items essential to the manufacturing process are covered even if they do not directly effect physical change in the goods.
Conclusion: The measuring and checking instruments were capital goods eligible for credit under Rule 57Q, and the departmental appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods essential to the manufacturing process may qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q even if they do not themselves directly produce or process the final product or bring about a physical change in the goods.