TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms valuation decision, prevents double taxation on stock exchange membership card transfer.</h1> The court upheld the Tribunal's decision on the valuation of the transaction involving the transfer of a membership card of a stock exchange. It prevented ... Capital gains tax - Income-tax Act vis-à-vis Gift-tax Act - whether the membership of the stock exchange is a property and on its transfer whether capital gains tax is attracted. The controversy has also been raised whether the value of the property should be taken at Rs. 10,00,000. - Whether the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in upholding that the consideration received by the appellant on account of nomination of another person in his place in respect of membership of stock exchange when the right of such nomination is not a capital asset, is chargeable as capital gains under section 45 – we see no infirmity in the order of the Tribunal so far as the direction given by the Tribunal that the value of the transaction should be taken at Rs. 10,00,000 and when the assessee has shown the consideration at Rs. 6,00,000, the balance amount, i.e., Rs. 4,00,000 attracts the gift-tax - held that once the difference between Rs. 10,00,000 and Rs. 6,00,000 are taxed under the provisions of the Gift-tax Act taking the difference as deemed gift, that amount cannot be taxed again in the Income-tax Act Issues:1. Gift-tax appeal questions of law2. Income-tax appeal questions of lawGift-tax Appeal Questions of Law Analysis:The primary issues raised in the gift-tax appeal questions of law revolve around the application of section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act. The first question questions whether there was a deemed gift taxable in the hands of the assessee. The second and third questions inquire about the transfer of property in the form of a membership seat of a stock exchange and whether it constitutes 'property' within the Act. The fourth question delves into the consideration for which the assessee has been charged to income-tax and its relation to gift-tax. The fifth query pertains to the burden of proof under section 4(1)(a) and its discharge by the Department. Lastly, the sixth question examines the valuation of membership fees for tax purposes under the Act.Income-tax Appeal Questions of Law Analysis:The income-tax appeal questions of law focus on the treatment of membership seat of a stock exchange as a property and its classification as a 'capital asset' under section 2(14) of the Act. The second question addresses whether nomination constitutes a transfer under section 2(47). The third query concerns the consideration of admission fees as the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains. The fourth question challenges the justification of treating consideration received on nomination as capital gains. The fifth question questions the addition of value based on estimates and equity. The sixth query debates the computation of capital gains based on actual or notional consideration. The seventh issue examines contradictory orders regarding the consideration for tax purposes. The eighth question queries the Tribunal's authority to enhance assessed income. The final question challenges the Tribunal's order as perverse, illegal, and contrary to the material on record.In summary, the judgment addresses the disputes surrounding the transfer of a membership card of a stock exchange, the valuation of property, the taxation implications under the Gift-tax Act and Income-tax Act, burden of proof, and the Tribunal's directions. The court upholds the Tribunal's decision on the valuation of the transaction but prevents double taxation by disallowing the taxation of the same amount under both Acts.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
