Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on Indwool Ceramic Fibre Blanket as an integral part or accessory of the furnace and, accordingly, as capital goods.
Analysis: The goods were used as lining material in the furnace and served to prevent escape of heat, thereby ensuring optimum use in manufacture. Their location and function showed that they were used in the manufacturing process and were integral to the furnace. The earlier Tribunal decisions recognizing similar goods as eligible for credit were followed.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on Indwool Ceramic Fibre Blanket was held admissible, and the challenge to the order allowing credit failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order granting Modvat credit was sustained, and the departmental appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Material used as furnace lining, when integrally connected with the furnace's functioning in manufacture, qualifies as an accessory or part for Modvat credit purposes.