Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a demand of excise duty and the consequential penalty, redemption fine and interest could be sustained solely on the basis of shortage of packing material, without further investigation into production, raw material consumption, labour deployment, or other relevant circumstances.
Analysis: The demand in dispute rested only on the shortage of plastic laminated flexible film said to be used as packing material. No supporting enquiry was made into other factors relevant to probable production or removal, such as utilisation of other raw materials, labour, or connected production data. A mere shortage of packing material, by itself, was held insufficient to found a demand in the absence of corroborative evidence showing manufacture or clearance of the alleged goods.
Conclusion: The duty demand based on shortage of packing material was set aside, and the connected penalties, redemption fine and interest relating to that demand were also set aside, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A duty demand for alleged unaccounted production or clearance cannot be sustained on the sole basis of shortage of packing material unless supported by independent corroborative evidence establishing the clandestine manufacture or removal.