Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the types of sand prepared and used by the respondents for making moulds and core boxes were liable to duty as excisable goods, and whether benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was available where such goods were used captively in the manufacture of excisable articles.
Analysis: The duty liability turned on marketability, particularly whether the sands had sufficient shelf life to be regarded as marketable goods. The materials placed before the Tribunal indicated that the various sands had limited shelf life, ranging from minutes to a few hours, and the earlier decisions relied on by the appellant were distinguished on the basis that they dealt with a different product. The Tribunal also noted that the goods were used captively in the manufacture of excisable articles, attracting the exemption contemplated by Notification No. 217/86-C.E.
Conclusion: The sands were not held liable to duty on the reasoning urged by the appellant, and the respondents were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E.; the appeal was accordingly against the appellant.