Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for relief from liability under section 633(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, can be decided merely on the pleadings and objections, and whether the inquiry under that provision must be conducted in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: Section 633(1) confers a special and discretionary power to relieve an officer of a company from liability only after the court finds that he is or may be liable and that he has acted honestly and reasonably and ought fairly to be excused. Such a determination necessarily requires an inquiry into whether the offence or default has been committed. In the absence of a special procedure in the Companies Act or the Rules, section 4(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies to offences under other laws, and the inquiry must therefore be conducted according to the Code. The court also observed that the proper course is to decide such an application along with the criminal case on the basis of evidence adduced at trial, rather than only on the averments in the application and the objections filed thereto.
Conclusion: The application under section 633(1) could not be validly disposed of only on pleadings and objections, and the inquiry had to follow the procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute confers relief from liability upon a finding that the accused has acted honestly and reasonably and ought fairly to be excused, the inquiry must be conducted on evidence in accordance with the applicable criminal procedure unless the statute itself prescribes a different mode.