Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible where the declaration and request for condonation of delay were filed within six months of receipt of inputs and no order rejecting condonation was communicated.
Analysis: Modvat availment under the Central Excise Rules required a proper declaration, and the delayed filing had to be accompanied by a request for condonation. On the facts, the declaration relating to the disputed inputs was filed within six months of receipt, along with the request for condonation. Since no communication was issued stating that the delay had not been condoned, the assessee was entitled to proceed on the normal presumption that the delay stood condoned. The inputs covered by the relevant invoices were therefore treated as having been validly declared within time.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Modvat credit on the disputed inputs, and the Revenue's challenge failed.