Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after a scheme of amalgamation had been approved by the requisite majority under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, the shareholders could requisition a meeting to require the company to withdraw the pending petition for sanction of the scheme, and whether ad interim protection should be granted.
Analysis: The scheme had already been approved in the meetings of shareholders and creditors convened under section 391(2), and the matter was ripe for hearing before the Court. The requisitioned meeting was directed towards a resolution requiring withdrawal of the sanction petition, which would undermine the statutory process already completed under section 391. The availability of a separate opportunity to object when the scheme came up for sanction was noted, and it was observed only prima facie that shareholders alone could not compel withdrawal of the petition after approval in the statutory meetings. The authorities relating to requisitioned meetings under section 169(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, were held inapplicable on the facts, since the board had not refused to call the meeting.
Conclusion: The requested requisitioned meeting was not permitted to proceed for the purpose of withdrawing the scheme petition, and the meeting was adjourned sine die pending final disposal of the judge's summons.