Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after a scheme of compromise or arrangement has been approved by the meetings of members and creditors in the manner prescribed under section 391, it is open to the shareholders alone by a requisitioned meeting to compel the company to withdraw the petition filed for sanctioning the scheme.
Analysis: The scheme for amalgamation was approved by the requisite majority of shareholders and secured and unsecured creditors in meetings held under the procedure laid down by section 391. The scheme has obtained statutory approval under the MRTP Act and the petition for sanction is ripe for hearing. The question is whether shareholders, acting alone by requisitioning a meeting, can require the company to withdraw the petition after approvals under the statutory procedure have been obtained. The shareholders may appear before the court when the scheme is considered and present objections for the court's determination. A subsequent change of circumstances affecting the propriety of sanctioning a scheme may justify refusal of sanction or recall of meetings under the statutory provisions, but that is a matter for the court to decide after full consideration and evidence. The cited authorities on requisitioned meetings under the Companies Act concern the board's obligation to call meetings and do not address the limited question arising where meetings and creditor approvals under section 391 have already been held.
Conclusion: Prima facie, once a scheme has been approved by the meetings of members and creditors in the manner prescribed under section 391, the shareholders alone cannot, by requisitioned meeting, compel the company to withdraw the petition for sanction; the appropriate course is to raise objections before the court or seek further relief from the court if change of circumstances justifies it. The meeting called for that purpose is directed to be adjourned sine die pending final disposal of the judge's summons.