Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of surplus cotton by a cotton textile manufacturer constituted carrying on the business of selling cotton so as to make it a dealer in cotton under section 2(6) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953.
Analysis: The respondents purchased cotton for use in their manufacturing business. The sale of 411 bales occurred because the earlier-arriving consignment created surplus stock and locking up of capital, not because the cotton had been acquired with an intention to trade in it. The existence of a power in the memorandum to buy and sell cotton, and prior isolated sales, were only relevant circumstances and were not decisive. The material question was whether the sales showed an intention to carry on a business of selling cotton or were merely incidental disposals of surplus raw material. On the facts, the department did not establish any offsetting circumstance showing a trading intention or profit motive.
Conclusion: The respondents were not dealers in cotton in respect of the impugned sales, and the sales were not taxable as business sales.
Ratio Decidendi: Disposal of surplus raw material purchased for use in manufacturing does not amount to carrying on the business of selling such material unless the surrounding circumstances show a trading intention or a business activity incidental to sale.