Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand based on inclusion of 4% recovered towards Central Sales Tax, post-manufacturing charges and incidental charges in the assessable value disclosed a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit; whether the plea regarding deduction of freight and interest on receivables was supported; and whether the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 11A was invocable.
Analysis: The letter from the railway authorities indicating that no sales tax amount had been paid to the assessee for the relevant period furnished a prima facie defence in respect of the CST-related demand. The plea that freight and interest on receivables would exceed the amount sought to be added was not supported by evidence, since there was nothing to show that the sale price included freight or that the price included interest for two months. The description in the invoices as incidental charges, PMC/Freight was held to be vague, and at the interim stage it could not be said that the departmental officers ought necessarily to have been alerted to the true nature of the amounts.
Outcome: Pre-deposit of Rs. 6 lakhs was directed, and on such deposit the balance duty, penalties and fine were waived and recovery stayed.