Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was liable to sales tax on the first purchase of timber and sleepers under the proviso to section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, when the goods were obtained against a certificate stating that they were intended for resale in Orissa.
Analysis: The goods were purchased tax-free on the basis of the appellant's certificate that they would be resold in Orissa. The appellant did not resell them in the State but exported them outside the State, so the condition on which exemption had been granted was not fulfilled. The tax was levied on the first sale to the appellant, which was independent of the subsequent supply to the Sleeper Control Officer and was not an inter-State sale. In these circumstances, the proviso to section 5(2)(a)(ii) applied and the earlier authorities rightly held the tax payable. No open question of law survived for reference.
Conclusion: The liability to tax under the proviso was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are purchased tax-free on a certificate for resale in the State, failure to comply with that certificate attracts tax on the first sale under the proviso to section 5(2)(a)(ii), and such levy is not barred by Article 286 when the purchase is not itself an inter-State sale.