Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for purposes of interim relief, the assembly of imported components into a paint shop amounted to manufacture so as to give rise to prima facie eligibility to Modvat credit under Rule 57A, despite the goods having been assessed as a complete paint shop under the tariff interpretative rules.
Analysis: The components had been imported and brought into the factory before 1-3-1999 and were assessed as a complete paint shop by applying the interpretative rule to the Customs Tariff. A prima facie conflict was noticed between that assessment and Note 6 to Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff, under which assembly of components into a machine or system may amount to manufacture. Reliance was placed on the Board's circular and Tribunal precedent taking the view that where assembly amounts to manufacture, the component parts are inputs and credit is available. The objection that the alternative ground was raised for the first time was not accepted, since it raised a question of law.
Conclusion: The applicant was held to have a prima facie case for Modvat credit under Rule 57A on the duty paid on the components.