Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on transfer of a factory by lease or other takeover arrangement, the transferee manufacturer could utilise Modvat credit lying in the predecessor's account, and whether the question of filing a fresh declaration arose.
Analysis: Rule 57F(6) was confined to the limited situation of shifting of a factory to another location and did not govern a change in ownership or takeover of the factory through merger, amalgamation, or similar transfer of assets and liabilities. In such cases, the transferee steps into the shoes of the transferor for excise duty and credit purposes. The declaration issue did not arise separately because the original manufacturer had already filed the declaration and a fresh declaration by the transferee was held unnecessary on the facts.
Conclusion: The transferee was entitled to utilise the Modvat credit earned by the predecessor, and no separate question on fresh declaration survived for adjudication.