Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views

Section 269SS and 269T- increase limits and widen coverage to achieve purpose

Date 09 Apr 2015
Written By
Proposed Amendments to Income Tax Act: Increase Loan Limits & Include Property Deals, Trade Advances, Agricultural Transactions
Sections 269SS and 269T of the Income Tax Act regulate the acceptance and repayment of loans or deposits. Proposed amendments aim to include specified payments for property deals. Despite inflation, the limit of 20,000 set in 1989 remains unchanged. The author suggests increasing this limit to at least 1,00,000 for loans and deposits, and 2,00,000 for property transactions. Additionally, the scope should extend to trade advances and agricultural transactions, requiring payments over 1,00,000 to be made through banking channels. The article argues for collaboration between state and central governments to tax agricultural income effectively. - (AI Summary)

Section 269SS and 269T concern about acceptance of loan or deposit of money and repayment of the same. In view of proposed amendments, after passing of FB 2015 specified payments for property deals will also be covered. Provisions provide for receipt as well repayment by way of A/c payee cheques or draft, e- banking transfers etc. in certain circumstances.

Limit must be increased:

The limit of ₹ 20000/- was increased long ago w.e.f. 01.04.1989  that is more than 26 years ago.  Even in proposed amendments vide the Finance Bill, 2015, these limits are kept unchanged.  During last 26 years , due to inflation, the value of money has gone down very much. To buy same  things which What one could buy for ₹ 20K in 1989, one will require ₹ 1,50,000/- to 5,00,000/- or more now depending to the item intended to be bought.

Cost inflation index for capital gain purposes for 1988-89 was  161 and for 2014-15  CII is 1024 so the increase in CII is 863. Simply speaking 1024 / 161 = 6.36 times.

This taken into account only 75% of inflation if we consider full inflation it will be 8.48 times which is equal to about ₹ 1,70,000/-.

We have also to consider that a man who could receive a loan of ₹ 20,000/- and purchase some set of things in 1989 now needs ₹ 1,70,000/- for same set of things considering CII. So naturally limit for taking loan should be increased. However, keeping in mind increase in banking facilities the limit of ₹ 20000/- may be raised to at least ₹ 1,00,000/-  for any loan and deposit and Rs. Two lakh for immovable property transactions.

Coverage must be widened:

Trade advances may also be covered by provisions of S.269SS and 269T.

Farmers, though earning only agricultural income should also be covered for all loans, advances, property payments, trade advances and payment etc.

A person who is having wealth and substantial agricultural income must be brought into banking channels for all such payments and receipts. Any payment for agricultural produce exceeding ₹ 1,00,000/- by one person to any other person must be by A/c payee cheque/ draft or e-banking.

Any person who has gross receipts from agriculture, of Rs.one lakh or more per month (twelve lakh per annum) must also be required to put through his deals through banking channels.

No perceived relaxation under Constitution of India (COI) 

The Constitution, permit tax on agricultural income by state governments. Under Constitution of India also  There is no perceived relaxation either about tax or other procedural requirements. Tax by State Government is to provide States a source of revenue. Central Government is not authorised to tax agricultural income, does not mean that it was intended that any amount of agricultural income should not be taxed. State governments and Central Government Can collaborate to determine, collect and share tax on agricultural income. Now it is high time for the same.

0 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present for this Article

Recent Articles