Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Please check the Service Tax Returns filed by you for the period July 2012 to September 2012 to ensure that it is filed

CASeetharaman KC
Service tax returns for July-Sept 2012 faced system rejections; CBEC accepted them despite registration date issues. The service tax filing process for July to September 2012 faced issues where returns were not reflected as uploaded due to system rejections. Assessees received only an XML upload acknowledgment without email notifications on rejections or necessary corrections. This lack of communication led to confusion, with many believing their returns were successfully filed. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) later accepted returns initially rejected due to registration date discrepancies, marking them as filed. However, concerns remain about penalties for late submissions, as the system does not notify assessees of rejections or reasons, complicating the filing process. (AI Summary)

This refers to the Service Tax Return for the period 1st July 2012 to 30th September 2012 which I have filed for some of my clients. I found that none of the returns filed by me has been reflected in the system as uploaded. Subsequently on checking the XML status option I discovered that the filed returns have been rejected for certain reasons. I am now filing these returns again after making the required corrections.

The point I would like to make is that when a return is filed by an assessee under the electronic media the assessee needs to get an acknowledgement by email and proper advise should be given to him to make him aware that the return filed by him is defective and that he needs to file it again after making necessary corrections. The department is not giving any such acknowledgement to the assessee. The only acknowledgement which the assessee gets is an acknowledgement stating that the XML file has been uploaded. To find out whether the return has been accepted by the system or not the assessee has to log in and view the XML status by going to options RET-EFiling- View XML Status, and if the Return is rejected then it would be construed that no return was filed for the period.

Most of the assessees would not even be aware of this and would be under the impression that the return has been filed successfully especially after receiving an acknowledgement stating that the XML file has been uploaded successfully.

As stated earlier, the assessee has to take the pains of finding out whether the return filed by him has been accepted or rejected by the system and if the return is rejected he has to find out the reasons for the rejection and then make the corrections and upload the corrected XML file again.

The Department does not send any acknowledgement whatsoever to the assessees email id stating the status of the return and also reasons for rejection if any.

As such, if the return is rejected by the system it would be construed that no return was filed at all and all fines and penalties associated with it would be applicable.

This is grossly unfair on the assessee especially given the fact that there have been sweeping changes in the law and several notifications need to be mentioned especially under works contract, reverse charge mechanism etc. The problem would be faced more by assessees who file their own returns without any professional help.

Please therefore ensure that the returns filed by you have been uploaded successfully

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles